Skip to content
UniRanking

Reference

Frameworks and bodies

A working reference to the systems universities are measured by and the bodies that accredit them. We are not affiliated with any of them.

Ranking systems

What each one measures

THE World University Rankings

Global

Times Higher Education weights research quality and teaching almost equally, with research environment close behind. International outlook and industry income carry comparatively little.

  • Research Quality 30%
  • Teaching 29.5%
  • Research Environment 29%
  • International Outlook 7.5%
  • Industry 4%
Official methodology ↗

QS World University Rankings

Global

Quacquarelli Symonds leans heavily on reputation surveys. Academic and employer reputation together carry 45% of the score, so nearly half of a QS position reflects how an institution is perceived rather than what it produces.

  • Research & Discovery 50%
  • Employability & Outcomes 20%
  • Global Engagement 15%
  • Learning Experience 10%
  • Sustainability 5%
Official methodology ↗

ARWU (Shanghai Ranking)

Global

The Academic Ranking of World Universities uses no surveys at all. Awards, highly cited researchers and top-tier publications decide position, which makes it the hardest to influence quickly.

  • Alumni & Staff Awards 30%
  • Highly Cited Researchers 20%
  • Nature & Science Papers 20%
  • Publications 20%
  • Per Capita Performance 10%
Official methodology ↗

U.S. News Best Global Universities

Global

Research performance combined with global and regional reputation surveys. Influential with North American audiences in particular.

Official methodology ↗

Regional rankings

Asia, Latin America, Arab region, Europe

Regional tables often reward institutions that struggle to place globally, and can be a faster route to visible standing.

Subject and specialised rankings

Global

Subject tables let a strong department earn recognition the institution as a whole cannot yet claim. Frequently the best first target.

Accreditation bodies

Who accredits what, and where

AACSB

Global · Business

The global standard for business schools, mission-focused with deep emphasis on Assurance of Learning.

Website ↗

EQUIS

Europe · Business

Administered by EFMD, emphasising internationalisation, corporate connections and ethics.

Website ↗

AMBA

UK · Business

Accredits MBA, DBA and master's programmes rather than whole schools.

Website ↗

ABET

Global · Engineering & computing

Essential for engineering, computing and applied science programmes, rooted in continuous quality improvement.

Website ↗

FIBAA

Europe · Institutional & programme

European quality assurance focused on employability, internationality and academic rigour.

Website ↗

QAA

United Kingdom

The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

Website ↗

TEQSA

Australia

Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.

Website ↗

NCAAA

Saudi Arabia

The Education and Training Evaluation Commission's national accreditation body.

CAA

United Arab Emirates

Commission for Academic Accreditation.

NAAC

India

National Assessment and Accreditation Council.

MQA

Malaysia

Malaysian Qualifications Agency.

NCEAC

Pakistan · Computing

National Computing Education Accreditation Council.

US regional accreditors

United States

HLC, MSCHE, NECHE, SACSCOC, WSCUC and NWCCU — the regional institutional accreditors.

Indicator weightings change between cycles. Always confirm against the publisher's current published methodology before acting on them.

Glossary

The acronyms, in plain terms

Rankings and accreditation are dense with shorthand. These are the ones that come up in almost every conversation.

AoL — Assurance of LearningAccreditation
A closed-loop process demonstrating that students actually learn what a programme claims to teach. Central to AACSB, and the single most common reason a first submission fails.
SER — Self-Evaluation ReportAccreditation
The formal document an institution submits at the start of a peer-review cycle, setting out how it meets each standard and with what evidence.
Triple CrownAccreditation
Informal term for a business school holding AACSB, EQUIS and AMBA simultaneously. Very few schools worldwide hold all three.
HiCi — Highly Cited ResearchersRankings
Clarivate's annual list of the most-cited researchers in their field. Counts directly in ARWU, which is why a single appointment can move position.
N&S PapersRankings
Articles published in Nature and Science. An ARWU indicator worth 20% of the total score.
PCP — Per Capita PerformanceRankings
An ARWU indicator dividing total score by full-time-equivalent academic staff, which favours smaller, research-dense institutions.
IR — Institutional ResearchProcess
The office responsible for data collection, analysis and reporting. In practice, the team that determines whether ranking submissions are accurate.
Web of Science and ScopusRankings
The two bibliographic databases ranking bodies draw citation data from — Clarivate's and Elsevier's respectively. Affiliation errors in either quietly suppress measured output.
SciValRankings
Elsevier's research analytics platform, built on Scopus. Commonly used to identify research strengths and benchmark against peers.
SDG — Sustainable Development GoalsRankings
The seventeen UN goals underpinning the THE Impact Rankings, which many institutions find a more attainable first target than the main table.
QA — Quality AssuranceProcess
The processes ensuring academic and institutional standards are maintained and evidenced — the machinery accreditors examine.
AACSBAccreditation
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Mission-driven rather than prescriptive, which is why two accredited schools can look very different.
EQUISAccreditation
European Quality Improvement System, run by EFMD. Weighs internationalisation and corporate connection more heavily than most.
ABETAccreditation
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Programme-level rather than institutional, and often a licensure prerequisite for graduates.

Independent and unaffiliated

UniRanking is an independent consulting firm. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected to any ranking organisation or accreditation body. All ranking decisions are made by ranking organisations, and all accreditation decisions are made by accrediting bodies. We help institutions prepare — we do not influence outcomes.

Not sure which framework fits?

Most institutions are better served targeting one or two well than all of them thinly. A discovery call is the fastest way to work out which.

Health CheckBook a Call